Archive for the ‘Schools’ Category

You are currently browsing the archives for the Schools category.


Composting Food Waste

Over the last two years of leading service projects in Washington DC, I have volunteered with several soup kitchens and homeless shelters. I respect and admire the work these organizations do. They help some of our most forgotten citizens.

One thing I love about some of these organizations is that they do great work rescuing unwanted food. For example, last year Bread for the City started its Glean for the City program, which gathers vegetables from local farms — all for free. And one of the better known examples of food-reclamation in the country was founded here in DC in 1989 — the DC Central Kitchen started off making meals for the homeless from the leftovers from the Presidential Inauguration festivals. These days, they rescue more than 600,000 pounds of food a year.

But in some cases at several social service organizations, I see a large amount of food waste ends up in the trash. I often wonder: Can these organizations compost? Is there a way to ‘close the loop’ on this process, to give back to the fields that produce the food? In response to these questions I raised to the DCFoodforAll Google Group, representatives from the Common Good City Farm, located near Howard University, say that the farm will start accepting compost from community members.

This may be just the start of a series of such community composting opportunities. In another response to these questions, the Director of Kitchen Operations at Miriam’s Kitchen, Steven Badt, noted that — even if there were local sites to compost — even a well-run service organization like Miriam’s would be daunted by the volunteer resources that regular composting would require. Also, there’s the question of volume: Badt estimates that the Kitchen ends up with fifty or a hundred or more gallons of food waste every day — “There is no way a community garden could handle/manage the amount.” He did note, however, that Miriam’s Kitchen will switch trash hauling companies in January 2011 to a company that does industrial composting. (This is just one of the green initiatives that they are undertaking there. Also they are looking at hiring a night green cleaning crew for their building. )

There are other opportunities on the horizon. Included in the DC Government’s proposed Healthy Schools Act, introduced by DC Council member Mary Cheh and Chairman Vincent Gray, there will be money set aside for a DC Schools compost pilot project. This could be a way to start a large scale composting program.

DC wouldn’t have the first large scale composting program in the nation. San Francisco implemented a mandatory composting law with fines for residents or businesses that throw anything compostable in the trash. Composting Bins in San Francisco (Image from www.treehugger.com)(When the law went into effect, most of the city was already in compliance, because many companies and landlords already changed their practices.) Currently the city of Denver has a pilot residential composting program happening. And in Milwaukee, Will Allen of Growing Power  says that his organization compost more than twelve million pounds of food waste yearly that came from a variety of different sources, from breweries to private homes.

Can Washington DC become another city to require composting? We are already the first city to install a bag tax. What would intermediary steps look like? A composting law could be years away. Could we start picking up small qualities of compost from social services agencies to take to community gardens? What are other ideas?

One of the first steps we can take is to support the Healthy Schools Act: On March 26 DC Council is holding a hearing on the Healthy Schools Act at 11 am in Room 500 of the John A. Wilson Building, 1350 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

What if the DC government created something like Baltimore Public Schools’ Great Kids Farm, a 33 acre educational farm in Catonsville, Maryland in response to this act? Class Trip to Great Kids Farm (Picture from washingtonpost.com)

Let’s show  support for the DC Schools Compost Pilot Program. This could be the first step towards closing the loop in getting food waste back to the land instead of the landfill.

Here are more details about the March 26 hearing:

Anyone wishing to testify at the hearing should contact Ms. Aukima Benjamin, staff assistant to the Committee on Government Operations and the Environment, at 724-8062, or via e-mail at abenjamin@dccouncil.us. Witnesses should bring 15 copies of their written testimony to the hearing. If possible, witnesses should submit a copy of their testimony in advance of the hearing to abenjamin@dccouncil.us. Witnesses will be allowed a maximum of three (3) minutes for oral presentation.

If you are unable to testify at the hearing, written statements are encouraged and will be made a part of the official record. Copies of written statements should be submitted either to the Committee on Government Operations and the Environment, or to Ms. Cynthia Brock-Smith, Secretary to the Council, Room 5 of the John A. Wilson Building, 1350 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C., 20004. The record will close at the end of the business day on April 2, 2010.

Thanks to Steven Badt, Greg Boom, Rebecca Kantar, Greg Plotkin, Jenn Roccanti, and Carl Rollins for their assistance on researching this topic on the DCFoodforAll Google Group.

Playing to Win Universal School Gardens

One of DC’s newest school garden teachers wants to enlist you in a national movement to grow sustainable food gardens at every school in the country. And all you have to do (right now) is CAST A VOTE  FOR CHANGE for Universal School Gardens.

by Ethan Genauer

When I started volunteering this winter as a garden science teacher with Washington Youth Garden, entering one 3rd-grade classroom every week to help instill knowledge and enthusiasm by the children for the wonders of nature, I had no idea that this experience would inspire me to initiate a national call for Universal School Gardens.

But when I witnessed the children’s smiles and eyes light up in the course of planting seeds and watching them sprout into seedlings and grow, my appreciation deepened for the many reasons why school gardens are gaining popularity and have an excellent track record for enhancing the educational learning and natural curiosity of young people. “Every student should be free to enjoy the incomparable thrill of tasting fresh healthy food that he or she had a direct hand in growing,” I thought, “and every school in America should sprout a garden!”

That’s why this March 2010, as spring fast approaches, I am asking you to join me in expressing support for the mission of “Good Food For All Kids: A Garden at Every School.” Simply by casting your vote for the principle of Universal School Gardens in the 2010 Ideas for Change in America contest sponsored by Change.org, you can help move this idea one important step closer from inspiration to reality.

After voting concludes on Friday, March 12th, the 10 most popular ideas will then be transformed into national grassroots social change campaigns. The staff at Change.org will reach out directly to relevant decision-makers to engage them on the winning ideas, and they will work with each winner to create a grassroots campaign and promote their idea nationwide. Already, “Good Food For All Kids: A Garden at Every School” was one of the top 3 ideas in the “Food and Agriculture” category in the first round. Now, we are playing to win the final round!

Although my vision for Universal School Gardens is ambitious, I believe that now is indeed the ideal moment for a new nationwide mobilization of Americans dedicated to the common purpose of achieving this delicious dream. We have extraordinary political momentum on our side. For example, the Obama administration has stated its commitment to putting an end to childhood hunger by 2015, and First Lady Michelle Obama recently launched her signature “Let’s Move” initiative aiming to combat the nation’s crisis of childhood obesity through strategies for healthier schools and better children’s fitness. Establishing sustainable food gardens at schools across America should be a key component of both of these efforts.

And we have a clear legacy of success to build on: Thousands of edible gardens have already been established at schools in every U.S. state. Educators have produced an abundance of garden-focused curricular standards in all subjects, from science and math to English and art, as well as the empirical evidence to demonstrate why school gardens are a fantastic educational tool and define best practices. A wealth of school gardening websites and resources is available to provide practical instruction.

After experiencing one of the coldest and toughest winters in United States history, with countless families struggling in the grip of a severe prolonged economic recession that has caused a rising tide of childhood hunger, this year many American children are anticipating spring with special fervor. When the snow is all gone and flowers once again begin to bloom, why not celebrate all across the country by planting a wave of new school gardens?

Ultimately, committing to the realization of good food for all kids may be one of the best ways that we can rebuild local economies while proving that investment in the health, nutrition and future of America’s young people will no longer be sacrificed to the convenience of serving them the cheap, bland, uniform, unhealthy processed foods that have become the standard school menu. Only when each and every student has the unhindered opportunity to access the daily nourishment of healthy foods will we be able to honestly claim that no children are being left behind.

It is no longer a secret that the diet of America’s youth needs to radically improve. Hunger, bad nutrition and obesity among children are leading causes of health risks and often contribute to poor classroom performance. A study by Feeding America (pdf) asserts that “food insecurity and hunger, together with other correlates of poverty, can dramatically alter the architecture of children’s brains, making it impossible for them to fulfill their potential.” By planting a garden at every school in America, we will ensure that every child has the opportunity to benefit from eating more fresh healthy foods. Let’s make 2010 the year that the idea of universal school gardening takes off as a force for positive change in U.S. education!

Ethan Genauer is a volunteer with Washington Youth Garden, helping to bring garden science into DC classrooms. Before moving to DC in 2009, he lived in New Mexico for several years, where he worked with sustainable community farms and led activities to increase youth engagement with sustainable food systems. In addition to seeking your vote for school gardens in the contest at Change.org, Ethan is inviting folks to join the new “School Gardens Across America” group at Facebook.

More Gardens, Less Sugar, Says D.C. Schools Chief

D.C. Schools Chief Operating Officer, Anthony Tata
D.C. Schools COO, Anthony Tata

By Ed Bruske
Contributing Editor

Anthony Tata, a former brigadier general and career Army officer in charge of procurement in Afghanistan, is the chief operating officer for D.C. Public Schools,  second in rank to chancellor Michelle Rhee. Tata was a close reader of our recent series of articles on the food served in D.C. schools–Tales from a D.C. School Kitchen–which questioned the highly processed and frequently sugary fare being served to children on a daily basis. Tata told The Washington Post that he is considering other options besides the school system’s current food provider, Chartwells. You  won’t find him disparaging Chartwells in this interview with The Slow Cook, except to say that school officials “are working with Chartwells to address concerns.”  Tata does say he is looking for ways to include more local produce in school meals and is considering a switch from highly-sweetened flavored milk. And there’s a new director of school food services on the scene who is particularly keen on school garden.

Question: First, some background. Can you tell us what the situation was like for food services in D.C. Public Schools in 2007 when Ms. Rhee took office as chancellor? How was food being prepared at that time? 

Answer: The District ran all aspects of its food service operation “in house.”  Secondary schools provided fresh cooked meals.  However, elementary school meals were “pre-plated” and not cooked fresh on site.  The meals were packaged off-site by a third party vendor and delivered to schools where they were heated at the school by school staff.  The number one issue raised consistently by students was that the food did not taste good.  As a result, students did not eat the meals, and many meals went to waste. In addition, DCPS consistently lost money (over $30 million in the three years before the Chancellor’s arrival) due to low participation rates and paying for wasted meals.  Shortly after the Chancellor’s arrival, we began a pilot program to improve food quality at a handful of DCPS schools. 

Question: What was your vision for food services after taking office, and why did Chancellor Rhee elect to outsource, or contract, the food provider role for D.C. Public Schools? 

Answer: After careful analysis, DCPS determined it could improve the quality of food and reduce financial losses through contracting with an external company to manage food service operations.   In addition, the decision to contract for food service was based upon the idea that a school district’s core competencies lay in teaching and learning, not in some of the business essentials such as food service. Given the millions of dollars the program was losing, DCPS studied the problem and determined that finding a proven food services company to execute the program would save money and improve food quality, as it does in many large school districts. 

Question: How did you come to select Chartwells? 

Answer: Like any large contract action, we selected Chartwells through a competitive solicitation process.  DCPS publicized a request for proposals, received those proposals and selected a board to review them. The board used the pre-defined criteria to evaluate the proposals including overall contract cost, financial condition of the vendor, and proposed transition plan.  Additionally, there was a student taste testing with each of the possible vendors. The board chose Chartwells based upon its performance against the selected criteria and the taste testing. 

Question: What were your expectations from Chartwells as far as the type and quality of food they would provide? 

Answer: DCPS expects Chartwells to provide our students with nutritious food that adheres to USDA guidelines and tastes good, as specified in their contract with us.  We also expect that Chartwells work with us to implement the most cost effective food services program possible. 

Question: Until this year, schoolchildren were being fed prepackaged “warm-up” meals from a sub-contractor. Who was that sub-contractor and where were the meals being prepared? 

Answer: Middle schools and senior high schools were receiving fresh cooked meals every day and still do. Elementary schools were being served the prepackaged meals prepared by a company called Preferred Meal Systems, Inc. that had been involved in the district for years. Preferred Meal Systems, Inc. is headquartered in Berkeley, IL and the meals for DCPS were prepared in a Preferred Meal Systems, Inc. facility just outside of Laurel, Maryland. 

Question: Did you form any opinions about those prepackaged “warm-up” meals? 

Answer: The students’ opinion is what matters most, and as I visited schools and participated in taste tests with students, they believed we could do better than pre-packaged meals. 

Question: How was the decision reached to discontinue serving prepackaged warm-up meals and switch to something called “fresh cooking” or “fresh cooked”? 

Answer:  The students wanted better tasting food, and we believe fresh cooked meals taste better.  We began the process of converting all 76 elementary schools from prepackaged to fresh cook in August 2009. We completed that conversion in January 2010. Over the previous six months, we established six production sites at high schools and retrofitted the 76 elementary schools to be able to do basic kitchen functions required for fresh cook operations. 

Question: Were you at all surprised by the type of food and the food preparation at H.D. Cooke Elementary School as described in the series of blog posts that appeared recently in The Slow Cook blog? 

Answer: In 2009, DCPS began a full-scale analysis of the food service program and Chartwells operations in our schools.  The analysis is on going, and we are working with Chartwells to address concerns and continue to improve food services operations. 

Question: That series of blog posts described only conditions at one elementary school. Do you think that fairly depicted the food being served throughout the D.C.Public Schools system, or are there schools experiencing a different kind of food service? 

Answer: The food services program at each school is designed to be standardized.  That being said, there are logistical factors at each school that will differ.  Those factors include the size of the lunch periods, the physical structure of the cafeterias, and the experience of the staff. 

Question: Are you satisfied with the food being served in D.C. schools, or do you have something else in mind? 

Answer: We set a high bar for our students’ health, and I will most likely never be completely satisfied and always strive to do better.  That is why DCPS continuously strives to improve the nutritional quality and taste of the food we serve our students.  For months we have been developing new programs to increase participation and satisfaction rates among our students, including school gardens, breakfast in the classroom, and farm to school programs. 

Question: Besides the heavily processed nature of the food being served at H.D. Cooke Elementary, one of the things that made a particular impression on me was the amount of sugar being served in the meals there. Do you have any concerns about that, in light of the finding by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control that the District of Columbia has the highest rate of adolescent obesity in the nation? 

Answer: DCPS is concerned about the health and welfare of our students, including their sugar intake.  We are in the process of analyzing the food services program from all factors, one of which is the nutritional value of the food we serve, including the sugar content. 

Question: Some school districts have stopped serving flavored milks or are offering them to students only occasionally because of their high sugar content. Do you foresee anything like that happening in D.C. schools? 

Answer: Yes.  In fact, our Food Services staff are currently researching alternative milk products to flavored milk that are attractive to students but do not contain as much sugar. 

Question: Is it true that the job of food services director for D.C. Public Schools went unfilled for an entire year? If so, why was that? 

Answer: The position was vacant for most of the year during which time the Office of the Chief of Staff to the Chancellor, and later my office, effectively managed food service operations in all of our schools.  DCPS was committed to finding the best possible candidate to fill the position and took that time to conduct a national search for that person. 

Question: What, exactly are the responsibilities of the director of food services for DCPS? 

Answer: The responsibilities of the DCPS director of food services  include overseeing all food service providers to our schools, analyzing the operations of the food services program, and ensuring that DCPS students are provided high quality, nutritional food. 

Question: You recently hired Jeffrey Mills to fill the position of food services director. How did you happen to hire him, and could you briefly describe his background and qualifications for the job? 

Answer: Jeffrey Mills was hired after a national search for a food services director.  We had 107 applicants and performed 18 interviews, after which we chose Jeff due to his background in the food services industry and his demonstrated success in improving food quality and ability to effectively use resources.

Jeff has owned and operated restaurants and has served as a consultant to many hotel and restaurant groups.  He has the background in food service and the entrepreneurial spirit to improve the DCPS food service program while maintaining efficiency in its cost.

Question: What is Mr. Mills’ mission, and what is your vision for school food going forward? 

Answer: My vision for the food service program is to provide the highest quality foods to our students.  Jeff’s mission is to create a food service program at DCPS that parallels the best school food service programs in the country.

Question: The “Healthy Schools” bill currently pending before the D.C. Council calls for schools to use locally sourced farm goods in school meals “whenever possible.” How realistic is that? 

Answer: The term “whenever possible” to define the frequency of DCPS’ ability to serve locally grown and processed foods will vary based on many factors, including seasonal availability and cost.  That being said, I personally feel that using more locally sourced foods is a realistic goal for the future.  In fact, DCPS began researching our options in this regard prior to the proposal of the Act.

Question: We are constantly told that school food budgets are extremely tight, that schools typically have about $1 to spend on food per meal. Is that about right? How tight is it?

 Answer: Yes, the budget is always tight.  Our goal is to implement creative ways to increase quality and offerings while keeping costs low. 

Question: How much are budget considerations a factor in trying to reach the kind of food service that is envisioned in the “Healthy Schools” legislation?  

Answer: As a public organization, the costs of new program initiatives are always a factor in whether or not we can implement them.  As part of the analysis of our food services program that we began last year, we are analyzing the costs associated with various program improvements, some of which are included in the legislation, to determine which would be the most beneficial and fiscally responsible. 

Question: President Obama this week released his proposed budget, which includes an increase of about $1 billion annually in the Child Nutrition Act to be split between subsidized school meals and other food programs. That means an additional 18 cents, more or less, for each subsidized school meal, or less than the cost of an apple. Were you hoping for more? 

Answer: I am pleased with any increase, as it benefits the students.  

Question: The “Healthy Schools” bill calls for increased physical education, and actual physical activity, for children in Kindergarten through grade eight. Do you think that will interfere with children learning core subjects such as reading and math? 

Answer: Regardless of how the learning environment may change or expand, DCPS students will have the resources they need to continue their upward trend in core subject proficiency. 

Question: Finally, “Healthy Schools” calls on D.C. schools to embrace the idea of school gardens, to establish means for providing technical support to build gardens, to work gardens into the school curricula, as well as finding ways to teach children about the benefits of locally grown foods. Does all of that sound feasible to you? 

Answer: In the long term, yes, it is feasible.  In fact, one of the first initiatives that Jeff Mills mentioned to me when he was interviewing for the position of Director of Food Services was that he wanted to create community gardens for our students.  Since we hired Jeff, he has been researching possible methods to expand the school garden programs at DCPS and has begun building relationships with possible community partners.

Ed Bruske writes The Slow Cook blog

The Life Cycle of a Child

Beans!This is the second posting in a series about my internship with the Washington Youth Garden. You can find the first one on Field to Fork.

Perhaps in the grand scheme of things, seven minutes is not very many minutes. To the existence of dinosaurs, seven minutes would be a tyrannosaurus fart. Gone without acknowledge of its existence. Not even worth batting a limp, useless forearm at. To a third grader, on the other hand, seven minutes of direct eye contact and explicit questioning is an eternity. Like weeks of jury duty, hours sitting in traffic for you or me. There is little outside the realm of battery-operated devices these days that can hold a seven year old’s attention for that many minutes (which is another issue entirely).

This past week was our second of lessons with Garden Science, and we were studying the life cycles of plants. Namely, beans. Remember in elementary school when you put a bean in a cup with a wet paper towel, waited several days, and then wet yourself when the roots emerged? That’s what we’re doing this week.

To start our lesson we define the words ‘seed,’ ‘germinate,’ and ‘maturity,’ which are the three main stages of the life cycle. The drilling is not shortchanged. We have a clearly marked diagram of a sprouted bean. We dissect soaked beans to identify the parts of said sprouted bean. We read a story that clearly outlines the lifecycle of a bean. We then ask the students to tell us about the lifecycle. Often, they do. Finally, we have a drawing exercise, where the students draw the three major components of the cycle: a seed, a germinated plant, and a mature plant, (which are, surprise, the vocab words of the day) using any plant of their choosing.

One student, let’s call her Shirley, chose to illustrate the life of a collard green plant. When I walked over to her, she had done very well – each stage perfectly depicted. The vibrant stylings of crayola artfully filled the space between her pencil strokes. Then it happened. I asked her, ‘what part of the plant is the collard green?’ Queue the clock.

“Ummm….it’s the collard green.” While this answer was technically true, and I must admit that at this response I faltered, this was clearly not the answer I was looking for. I pushed on, inquiring what structural part of the plant comprised the collard green. For the first several minutes, I gave her no help. Asking her shamelessly leading questions, I hoped that she would think back on our prior discussion and come up with the answer herself. “What grows out of the stem in the germination stage?” Shirley stares. Briefly flicks her eyes in the direction of the clock. And stares.

Yielding no progress, I switched approaches.

“OK, what color is a collard green?”

“Green.”

Excitement wells inside me.

“YES!, and think about a tree…you know what a tree looks like, right? What part of a tree is green?”

Shirley’s eyes narrow and after a short pause she says, “leaves.”

“YeS!” trying to pretend like my wild eyes and brimming excitement are not freaking her out, I continue, “and so, what part of the collard green is the collard green??”

“…………the root….?” And her eyes go back to the clock. And my head droops. Just a little bit.

In the end, I gave up.

“It’s the leaf,” I sighed, and got up to move on. Shirley stares at me, and after a moment, continues coloring without any hint of acknowledgement.

While my interaction with Shirley, and others of the sort can be comical, even turned into enjoyable anecdotes, the reality is that these comments are indicative of a fairly serious knowledge gap. A lack of understanding of the food they eat and the natural world around them. One student announced to the class that his  favorite vegetable is dough. I was asked by a nine year old if a shrimp is a vegetable. Shrimp are not vegetables. Shrimp are animals.

Unfortunately, this reality of under-education is more a rule than an exception in the lives of average American children. There are myriad forces working against our nation’s children, like corporate advertising, rising inactivity, lack of access to real food, and skyrocketing rates of childhood obesity and diabetes, which result in the gap that our hero has exemplified when discussing collards.

Please know that my intention is not to patronize or look down upon our students, by any means. It is not right to lay blame on the children who are a part of this national ‘mindset,’ if you will. Quite the contrary, I call attention to Shirley and the rest of our students because, in a sense, they are in the minority of the majority by having the opportunity to be a part of the Garden Science programming. They have a chance to acquire the knowledge to fill the gap, and this is one of the many reasons Garden Science excites me.

I’d like to think that our discussion had an impact on Shirley, even if she didn’t directly acknowledge it. In fact, I know that it did. Or at least that it will. Because when the program comes to an end, Shirley will come to the garden, having participated in six more classes. She will have picked up tidbits here and there (accumulating, needless to say, that many more tidbits than her peers who did not get to participate in Garden Science).  She will frolic around with her classmates, dodging in and out of the beds, nibbling veggies, generally going nuts. Finally, she’ll run up to me, panting, sweat dribbling down her adorable little brow, holding up a young lettuce plant that, as a result of her unbearable excitement, she has just uprooted instead of harvested. She will say “hey! Mr. Andrew! Leaves!”

Shirley will know that leaves are edible because, even though I gave in to her disinterest last Tuesday, I won’t give up. I’m still new at the education game. Still getting my bearings. Finding my sea legs. No, I won’t give up. Nor will Kacie. Nor will Garden Science. Nor will the movement. I understand now that the most potent current that drives our sustainable food movement is belief. Believing in your message. Believing in your motive. Believing in your lunch. Believing in your students. Believing that even though Shirley isn’t interested now, she will be. Believing that seven uncomfortable minutes with Shirley are worth it, because in the grand scheme of shifting paradigms, seven minutes is not very many minutes.

If you have any questions, comments, general concerns, or are unclear about the structural significance of your favorite vegetable, you can contact me at aplotsky@washingtonyouthgarden.org

Behind the White House Photo Ops, School Gardens Desperate for Help

Sarah Bernardi is one of the teachers from Bancroft Elementary School here in the District of Columbia whose students famously have been helping Michelle Obama grow the new White House vegetable garden.

By Sarah Bernardi

Student in Field As one of the teachers involved with Michelle Obama and the White House vegetable garden, I’ve been impressed with the sudden surge of public interest in the simple act of children planting seeds. At Bancroft Elementary School, where I work first and foremost as an art teacher, we know only too well the benefits children get from growing their own food.

But I don’t think the public has any inkling how hard it is for teachers to maintain school gardens like the one we have at Bancroft. Despite all the hoopla over school gardening, the truth is teachers engage in these activities at risk of their jobs. You see, gardening is not part of the mandated school curriculum. We are supposed to be teaching reading and math. As much as we believe school gardens offer a multitude of teaching opportunities, schools do very little to support us. Principals and teachers have been bluntly told that they will lose their jobs if math and reading scores don’t improve. We desperately need help. We need someone to take charge of our school gardens.

Toni Conklin tours the First Lady around Bancroft's gardenThe kids you see in all the photos working with the First Lady in the White House garden, or making breakfast on the Today Show with the Obamas’ chef, Sam Kass, are fifth graders from my school. One of the reasons I chose to work at Bancroft two years ago was its garden. I had just moved back to the Washington area from South Carolina where I grew things pretty much all year round in my own yard. With visions of sunflowers and big tomato plants dancing in my head, I signed up for a community garden plot in D.C. But the waiting list was long. The idea of living without a patch of dirt to play in was hard to swallow.

Read the rest of this entry »

Our Healthy Schools Act

[UPDATE: time and room change!] A hearing on the Healthy Schools Act of 2009 will be held on Tuesday, February 9, 2010 at 11:00AM in room 500 Wednesday, February 10, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. in Room 412 of the John A. Wilson Building located at 1350 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW. To sign up to testify contact Aukima Benjamin at the DC Council: ABenjamin@DCCOUNCIL.US or (202)724-8062

Like most of the food movement folks in DC who are concerned with community food security and its relationship with public health, I am very excited about the Healthy Schools Act of 2009 that is winding its way through the DC Council’s legislative process. Improving school cafeteria nutrition is long overdue, as are the physical exercise provisions. This bill is a great first step and has the potential to positively impact DC schools and the children who grow up here. I plan to testify in support of the bill at the hearing on February 9th and I encourage others to join me!

However there are areas where I see the need for improvement. One of these has to do with the lack of measures to enable District food enterprises to really take advantage of the farm to school provisions. In other states, farm-to-school initiatives have created significant demand for produce grown by the states’ own farmers.

In a sense, this element is lacking in the Healthy Schools Act as proposed. Why? Well, DC has few farmers.

This, though, can be remedied by amending the Act to specifically cite the decades old DC law–the “Food Production and Urban Garden Program” (DC Code §48-402). This law requires that the city “encourage…produce markets throughout the District of Columbia to increase the supply of and demand for urban gardens.” It also calls for “incentives and community outreach” to be used to ensure that vacant lots in DC are used to grow fresh, affordable food. But the law has gone un-implemented.

What does this have to do with healthy schools and farm to school? The Food Production and Urban Garden Program also required the schools to make “use of suitable portions of buildings and grounds” in furtherance of the program.

Sadly, despite having over 20 vacant, unused school buildings and who knows how many greenhouses, none of this has been done. Little else the city has done has been successful; as only one supermarket has opened in the most deprived areas in the last decade, and the only thing that approached a real live full-service farmers market East of the River closed down just over a year ago (read about it here and here). The one remaining DC Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) employee who works on gardens and the environment is swamped with all kinds of unrelated tasks by her bosses who lack the vision and desire to carry out the law as it applies to DPR.

There is no reason why the School Gardens Program provisions in the Healthy Schools Act cannot be used to implement this law whose time has come. In fact, the farm to school provisions should require that the school system prioritize the buying of fresh produce and processed food that has been grown inside the District to jumpstart this new market.

Only then will this legislation truly be fair for all citizens of the city. It would then go a long way towards bringing more food to neighborhoods where it’s lacking, provide badly needed job training for green jobs in urban agriculture, and improve public health.

I hope you will join in trying to make a good law better by encouraging our policymakers to go farther and make this a stronger bill with better language.

Carl Rollins volunteers as a farm coordinator at Common Good City Farm

SPROUT at the Washington Youth Garden

Do you know any young gardeners-to-be? If so, bring them out to the Washington Youth Garden, a nonprofit organization that’s been teaching our District youngsters about gardening for forty years.

Area schools and youth organizations can experience the child-friendly one-acre organic vegetable and fruit garden on the grounds of the National Arboretum during the spring, summer, and fall months. This free program, called SPROUT (Science Program Reaching OUT), uses the garden as a tool to teach environmental science and nutrition education.

Depending on the season, students could harvest potatoes, plant lettuce, dig for earthworms, stir the compost pile, or pick blueberries. No matter what the season, all students will participate in the making and eating of a healthy snack.

Our goal is to bring this gardening and nutrition experience to one thousand DC youth. So please help spread the word to any people you know who work with students to let them know that this opportunity is available.

We are available Mondays through Fridays,starting in April, to conduct this ninety minute program. For groups who are unable to access transportation, off-site programming can be delivered on a limited basis.

You can find a flyer about the program here. For more information, email kwarner@washingtonyouthgarden.org or call 202-245-2709.

Ramping up Farm to School in “Healthy Schools”

Could a centralized storage, processing and distribution kitchen be key to providing wholesome, local produce to the District’s school children?

“Healthy Schools” legislation pending before the D.C. Council would require that city schools use locally grown farm goods in school meals “whenever possible.” With some 60,000 students to be fed on a daily basis, that certainly would represent a boon to the local farm economy. But is it feasible?  How can we convince farmers to bring their products into the District?  And how can we store vegetables from a growing season that doesn’t exactly coincide with the school year?  How can we get these local foods to schools for an affordable price?

Farm to School stakeholders met to discuss with staff for Councilmember Mary Cheh (D-Ward 3), author of the “Healthy Schools” bill, how legislation could encourage farm to school programs in the District, and solve some of the issues facing existing food programs.  A diverse crowd filled a conference room in the Wilson building last Thursday – food service providers, a farmer, the Director of  Office of the State Superintendent’s Wellness and Nutrition division, Cooperative Extension Service agents, a farmers’ market director, and others.

D.C. Central Kitchen staff were among those who added an important voice to the meeting.  DCCK has been developing its own system for gathering and processing produce from farms in the Shenandoah Valley and distributing them to the 5,000 clients it feeds daily. Representatives from DCCK described how they chop, vacuum-pack and freeze fresh farm goods on a regular basis, both for serving city shelters and in their school food service operation at Washington Jesuit Academy.

There was no doubt that Councilmember Cheh’s office was impressed with the descriptions of the cost-effective operational model that Central Kitchen has created – especially the impact the program has had on schoolchildren they serve.  If Mary Cheh’s staff wants to get serious about getting more healthful, local foods into D.C. schools, creating a scaled-up version of DCCK’s transport/storage/processing facility should be high on their agenda.

A few ideas developed throughout the meeting.  Top of the list was the possibility of the city providing a warehouse where this kind of processing modeled by D.C. Central Kitchen could be ramped up to match the needs of District schools. There are solutions to  farm to school logistical issues (transport, storage, processing, etc.) that can be dealt with in the private and non-profit sector without being codified into law, however.

I think everyone agreed that setting stringent requirements that local farm goods be “sustainably” produced, as contained in the current bill, may be asking too much, since no precise definition seems to exist for what constitutes “sustainable.” Better, we think, to require schools to disclose where their foods are coming from, and simply urge that they be produced according to eco-friendly principles.

We also agreed that an across-the-board increase in school meal reimbursements from the D.C. government is needed to cover the farm-to-school preferences and other nutrition requirements included in the bill, perhaps as much as 12 cents or more per meal. And we need to mandate that schools and other organizations collaborate in promoting the farm-to-school idea and teaching it in the schools.

This working group meeting was a breakthrough for our efforts to get a farm-to-school program up and running here in the District. Mary Cheh and her staff gave us a great excuse to bring the right people together to have a real discussion, and we credit them immensely for it.

The legislation is headed for public hearings next month.

Andrea Northup is coordinator of the D.C. Farm to School Network

Local Restaurants for Local Kids

Looking for an excuse for a night out this Friday? Look no further! On January 22nd you can support locally-owned restaurants, the sustainable local food economy, and Washington, DC kids! The DC Farm to School Network’s Local Restaurants for Local Kids fundraiser is happening at some of the best restaurants in the District.

Several local food and drink hot spots are generously donating a portion of their proceeds to the DC Farm to School Network this Friday. The DC Farm to School Network is an organization that works to bring healthy, local produce into DC public school cafeterias. By simply enjoying a delicious snack, cocktail, or dinner at one of the great participating restaurants, you will help to improve access to healthy, tasty and local foods in D.C. schools! See below for listings, or at the Facebook page.

DC Farm to School Network volunteers will be available at the restaurants, ready to answer questions or chat with you about our work. We look forward to seeing you at the restaurants below—tell your friends! We’re also looking for more volunteers – email Lauren@dcgreens.org if you’re interested.

Learn more about the DC Farm to School Network at www.dcfarmtoschool.org

    Thursday, January 21st

Blue Ridge
5:30pm-10:30pm
2340 Wisconsin Avenue NW

    Friday, January 22nd

Busboys & Poets
5th and K Street NW (Mt. Vernon Sq. Metro)
14th and V Street NW (U St. Metro)
4251 S. Campbell Ave, Arlington, VA

Coppi’s Organic (from 6pm-11pm)
1414 U Street NW (U St. Metro)

Eatonville
2121 14th Street NW (U St. Metro)

Bar Pilar
1833 14th Street NW (U St. Metro)

Farmers & Fishers (All day!)
3000 K Street NW (Georgetown Waterfront—Foggy Bottom Metro)

Clyde’s
3236 M Street NW (Foggy Bottom Metro)
707 7th Street NW (Gallery Place Metro)
5441 Wisconsin Avenue, Chevy Chase, MD (Friendship Heights Metro)

PS-7 (Lounge from 4pm-2am)
777 I Street NW (Gallery Place Metro)

Bread and Brew (5-8pm in bar)
1247 20th Street NW (Dupont Circle Metro)

Cafe Saint-Ex
1847 14th Street NW (U St. Metro)

RIS (Proceeds from seasonal cocktail & appetizers after 4:30pm)
2275 L Street NW
(Foggy Bottom Metro)

Children and Food

Photo by by Brynn Grumstrup Slate

Photo courtesy Brynn Grumstrup Slate

Food access is a topic that is gaining attention both nationally and locally.  A few stories this past week have converged on the topics of food access and children.

The momentum for school gardens and for students to have a better understanding of their relationship to food is building–especially in the nation’s capital.  The installment of the White House Kitchen Garden almost a year ago is not only the first large-scale garden on the White House grounds since Eleanor Roosevelt’s victory garden during the Second World War, but is being used by Michelle Obama as a platform to engage national dialogue on health, nutrition, and food security.  In particular, her focus is on kids: “You can affect children’s behavior so much more easily than you can adults,” she said.

In September 2009, Michelle Obama invited students from Bancroft Elementary School to help prepare the garden and plant crops.  The positive response the White House has received on this and a gathering of Obama Administration officials last month to discuss their efforts to improve America’s food system lead many to be hopeful that “every American child can have access to healthy and affordable food.”

With so much rhetoric currently focused on school gardens (spurred on by a recent editorial by Caitline Flanagan criticizing the school garden movement), it is important to remember that food access for children is as much about ensuring kids are eating healthy as it is about ensuring that they are getting enough food.  Problems such as child obesity and child hunger both demand attention.  They are manifestations of the same, complex and immensely-challenging national problem which allows profit interest to push unhealthy and processed foods to children; contributes to an increasingly demanding lifestyle which makes families pick ease and convenience in food preparation (even when they do find time for a family meal); allows healthier options to cost more, which compels parents on a limited budget to buy food that is more likely to make their children sick; or worse, forces families to choose between paying for housing, energy, medical costs and filling their stomachs.

Before he was elected president, Barack Obama set a goal to end hunger among children in the United States by 2015.  Though Michelle Obama’s healthy kids initiative has begun to address some of these problems by bringing awareness to child obesity, emphasizing the importance of learning about local and healthy foods at a young age, encouraging improvements to the  National School Lunch Program, and fueling momentum behind the school garden movement, it is only a beginning.  A recent Washington Post article about child hunger observes that “since his inauguration, Obama has seldom broached the subject. His aides brainstorm weekly with several agencies, but their internal conversations so far have not produced fundamentally new approaches.”

In November 2009, a USDA report on U.S. food insecurity found that:

  • The number of food-insecure households sharply increased from 13 million in 2007 to a little more than 17 million in 2008
  • The increase was proportionally larger for households with children: the prevalence of food insecurity rose from 15.8 percent in 2007 to 21.0 percent in 2008
  • The prevalence of very low food security households–defined as “food intake of some household members is reduced, and their normal eating patterns are disrupted”–more than doubled from 1999 to 2008, increasing from 3.1 to 6.7 million
  • In 2008, 16.67 million children (22.5 percent) are affected with low or very low food security among members of their household

How are children in DC affected by all of this? On the one hand, there is some progress: DC Council members recently introduced a bill that would, among other things, establish local nutritional standards for school meals, create monetary incentive and funding for a farm-to-school distribution system, and require teaching about the benefits of local foods.  However, more than 12 percent of all households in the District were food insecure in 2006-2008.  Severe recession and rising home heating costs, coupled with President Obama’s proposed funding reduction for Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) in 2010 (from $5.1 million in 2009 to $3.2 million 2010), and recent cutbacks in affordable housing funding in DC are forcing families to make very difficult decisions about basic living needs. “In DC where 1 in 10 households are on the waiting list for affordable housing, it’s no coincidence that 1 in 8 households reported having trouble putting food on the table in 2008.  Hunger in DC has likely become worse since then, as the recession pushed unemployment to an all-time high in 2009,” a recent DC Fiscal Policy Institute report states.

Like other social issues, food insecurity is intricately tied with other problems–such as poverty, poor nutritional education, and economic stratification–and are results of competing political, social and economic interests.  Children are especially vulnerable to the effects of hunger and malnutrition, which can have lasting damages on their health and development.  Michelle Obama’s focus on food access for children is a good start, but food security for children is far more challenging than just any one course of action (such as additional funding to food programs).  Awareness and activism needs to occur at every level between national policy and community action.  Though this is by no means a comprehensive list, here are some ways we as a community can begin to affect change:

  • Hold President Obama to his goal of ending child hunger
  • Raise local and national awareness on food security and food access through dialogue, forums, letter-writing to Congressmen, blogging, and other forms of online and offline social media
  • Volunteer with this year’s DC homeless count on January 27, 2010, which will be especially important because the Fenty administration hasn’t allocated funds to support homeless services past March 2010
  • Support local organizations that provide on-the-ground assistance for the community, as well as empower individuals to help themselves in the long term
  • Push for expansion of much-needed low-income programs, such as food stamps
  • Look out for each other and for neighbors who may need a little extra help, especially in the summer and winter on days with extreme temperatures

Xi Wang helped Neighborhood Farm Initiative on the DC Community Garden Census and works with Food Not Bombs, which shares meals, literature, and other necessities to create community solidarity.

[Cross posted to DC Food Not Bombs]

On Twitter

Categories

Previous Posts